Youth
Overview
Retired orchestra conductor Fred Ballinger is on vacation with his daughter Lena and his film director best friend Mick Boyle in the Alps when he receives an invitation from Queen Elizabeth II to perform for Prince Philip's birthday.
Cast
-
Paolo Sorrentino Director -
Michael Caine Fred Ballinger -
Harvey Keitel Mick Boyle -
Rachel Weisz Lena Ballinger -
The Retrosettes Swing Band
-
Gabriella Belisario Escort
-
Laura De Marchi Escort's Mother -
Paul Dano Jimmy Tree -
Alex Macqueen Queen's Emissary -
Ian Attard 1st Queen's Emissary Assistant -
Adam Jackson-Smith 2nd Queen's Emissary Assistant -
Dorji Wangchuk Buddhist Monk
Watch Youth Online Free on World4ufree
Youth (2015) is available to stream free in HD on World4ufree. This movie sits in the Comedy, Drama, Music categories and was produced in Italy. Watch it online without signing up, or download it where the source allows.
Press play to start watching immediately — there is no sign-up, no subscription and no app to install. The player remembers your position, so you can close the tab and resume later. Subtitles and quality options are listed on the player page.
If you enjoy Youth, the recommendations below are the closest matches in the World4ufree catalogue by genre, country and audience.
More like this
Available Subtitles
English,Filipino,Français,Indonesian,Português,Русский,اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ,اُردُو,বাংলা,ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,中文
source: Youth
If there ever was a trailer that could not sell his movie right, then it is the one for ''Youth'' by acclaimed director Paolo Sorrentino, who's previous film was the Oscar-winning ''The Great Beauty''. The trailer made it look like a generic feel-good comedy, but it turned out to be a heart-warming, emotional and beautiful film. The story takes place in a resort hotel in the Alps, where a retired conductor (Michael Caine) and his friend, a film director (Harvey Keitel) who writes the screenplay for his ''Testament'', are on holiday. Both are confronted with their past, future and momentariness. Both actors have a great supporting cast on their side, everyone with their own burdens: Rachel Weisz plays Caine's daughter who is also his assistant, who feels neglected by her father and, in an great emotional monologue, expresses her feelings towards him. Paul Dano plays a character actor who is only known for a single insignificant role and wants to be recognized as a versatile actor. Jane Fonda plays a Diva who was a regular collaborator with Keitel's character and also has a great dialogue scene with him. Other characters are a retired Maradonaesque football player and a masseuse who touches than talks and many other great characters. It would seem that all these ''damaged'' characters would give this film an overly sentimental tone, but drama and humor is so well balanced that the shift between comedy (and there is a lot of it) and drama never seems abrupt and doesn't interrupt
I'm trying to think how I'm going to generate 10 lines about this spectacularly terrible film - certainly one of the worst I've ever seen. The only way this can have been financed is by its inclusion of two "bankable" stars - Harvey Keitel and Michael Caine. However what it was that attracted them to the script beats me. Nonetheless they manage - Michael Caine in particular - to give what must surely be the least convincing performances of their careers. Which is hardly surprising considering the portentous drivel that they have to spout. I've not bothered to look at anything about the team who made it but it has the feel of a vanity project authored by a group of wealthy film school graduates in their twenties who have minimal experience of life but who have seen a lot of European "art cinema". One recent film it reminded me of was "La Grande Belleza", the difference being that that film actually had some interesting ideas and strong performances. I stopped watching twice and had a hard time convincing myself to invest any more time on it; on the second occasion, a couple of minutes into the concertscene, about 15 minutes before the end (it feels almost interminable) I didn't bother to resume. Toward the end of this pretentious and totally unconvincing farrago there are a couple of extended expository monologues which attempt to plug the holes in the sieve which constitutes a plot. There's so much wrong with "Youth" it's impossible to find anything positive to say about it.
Youth is 'an artsy movie'. This means that it has all artsy movie clichés, as follows: no structure (just a bunch of random scenes glued together with a duct tape), no characters (talking mannequins put in random places), no plot, no joy, no substance. It's just sad and insanely boring set of shots that vary from mildly annoying to flat out disgusting. Apparently it was supposed to be a study of aging. The movie presents a bunch of 'secondary characters' (young aspiring filmmakers, conductor's daughter, miss universe with disgusting silicon tits, queen's emissary, some young actor, a freaking buddhist monk) and it throws this interesting pack into beautiful hotel located in Alps to sit and talk about life and death. The main characters are 2 old farts. One grumpy ex - orchestra conductor and second retiring filmmaker. One is old and bitter and he doesn't want to perform anymore, because of some personal tragedy, the second is still kicking, but he eventually gives up too after one of his muses resigns from being in his last movie and the guy jumps off the balcony and I was supposed to care, but I didn't, because this movie was so disgusting and boring that I almost fell asleep halfway through it... I wouldn't be so negative if there was some artism included in this piece. But no, all we see are metaphores served with the subtlety of Mike Tyson knocking down his opponent, 80 years old penises, silicon breasts, old people in the pool, Hitler and jokes about urinating repeated 1
The actors are mostly fine,although I have never liked anything Paul Dano has done, but the dialogue is stilted pseudo intellectual absurdest, claptrap. I seldom feel so annoyed as this movie made me feel. What a waste of talent and time. It tries to manipulate the viewer but there is not one real moment in the whole bloated mess. I do not understand how it has a rating as high as it is, Of course as a small art film, it has probably had a certain type of self indulgent audience, who see what is not there. I have seen films that tried for something different,off kilter, or surprising, which were in some way successful, meaningful, and/or entertaining. This is not one of those films.
This film is about the emotional problems of very, very talented; very, very rich people. It features fake desire, fake spirituality, fake grief, fake love, fake friendship. The script is in English - that is to say, the words spoken are English words, but they seem to have been generated from Italian via free automatic translation. It managed to be both totally incredible and totally predictable. It might be the worst film I've ever seen. It is definitely the most pretentious. The photography is quite pretty. More lines of text are required... so I'll just say that Michael Caine does not make a convincing conductor, and that some of the musicians involved seemed appropriately embarrassed.